Design Abstract (400 words)


Inside The Mountain

Angela Watkinson
MAU: Community Performance Centre
 
Mangere mountain and lagoon form part of Auckland’s volcanic landscape punctuated with positive and negative forms. This mountain and lagoon are the main reference points for this design; the volcanic mountain theatre and its corresponding marae atea lagoon.

Balance & atmosphere

The result is a careful balance. Between the human scale of the community centre and the geological scale of the mountain theatre rising up of the mangrove seascape and reclaiming this land as the mangroves have done over the past 50 years. Between tapu and noa. Between the ancestral theatre of the whare nui and the mountain theatre of MAU, mediated by the marae atea.

The goal inside the theatre was to create a space encouraging a different reality and awareness. A powerful but reverent place, a space of silence, absence of distracting thought, and the darkness of creation – Tagaloa.

Philosophy of place, genius loci, mutability

The community centre goal was to build a place where the people want to be, like a temple space – promoting relationships, creating, playing, being. Social concepts create attachment to a place – people create the energy associated with place, not the structure[1]. Using the philosopher Heideggers’ meaning of dwelling, they will be able to dwell in this place and ideally help create it; the whare nui will be a blank canvas to place carvings and internal decoration relevant to them, created or commissioned by them, created on site.

The pivotal space

The main entry is mediated by the marae atea and provides clues as to how to behave, protocols, links with the past, ancestors and relationships to be acknowledged during powhiri. A path of choreographed experiences, suggestions of what is to come, invitations to move in a certain way.
The whare nui leads directly off the sunken marae atea but only the front is addressed, like a person[2] (the back is not important, it is buried). The movements and symbolism which bring life to the physical form of the marae atea resemble a circle[3] and this marae atea expresses this concept using the Mangere lagoon contours. It is a powerful space, like the malae. You cannot enter this space unnoticed and you will leave a trace behind in the sand.


[1] Lefas, Pavlos. Dwelling and Architecture. From Heidegger to Koolhaas. Jovis Verlag GmbH, 2009.
[2] McKay, Bill and Antonia Walmsley. “Maori Time: Notions of Space, Time and Building Form in the South Pacific.” Idea 1, (2005): 85-97.
[3] Durie, Mason. 'Marae and implications for a modern Maori psychology', The Journal of Polynesian Society 108, no. 4 (1999): 351-366.
 




[1] Lefas, Pavlos. Dwelling and Architecture. From Heidegger to Koolhaas. Jovis Verlag GmbH, 2009.
[2] McKay, Bill and Antonia Walmsley. “Maori Time: Notions of Space, Time and Building Form in the South Pacific.” Idea 1, (2005): 85-97.
[3] Durie, Mason. 'Marae and implications for a modern Maori psychology', The Journal of Polynesian Society 108, no. 4 (1999): 351-366.
 


Design features: 
- community access reason for choosing Norana Park
- the outdoor stage has direct access to the main stage, and also the MAU studio rehersal area; the island can form a visual focus behind.
- the theatre can be seen from the bridge, and at night will have a subtle volcanic glow
- walking to the theatre, visitors have to cross over bridges which span the open space between the foyer and theatre; the distinctive smells of the mangroves and the sounds of the wind will be apparent.
- designed so that from the wharenui you can see across to the inlet to the portage site, but also can see through the wharekai and points through the accomodation block.







 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment